70th GSC Agenda Items – Short Survey

Your input is requested!

The 70th General Service Conference will be held virtually this year in June. You can help by providing your feedback on as many or as few topics as you wish. This survey will be live through the month of April.

Your thoughts are part of the Area 46 Group Conscience! Your opinion is needed.

We value your time. Please answer as many as you like. The agenda items are broken down by category (Literature, Corrections,etc.) so you can choose the categories you are most interested in.  No answers are required so feel free to skip any you do not wish to answer or comment on. If you want to move on, just simply click next in the lower right corner.

Thank you for taking the time to provide your input. This is truly AA in action.

In Love and Service,

Bill L.

Panel 70 Delegate
Area 46, New Mexico


Consider if proposed agenda items for plain language, simplified language, accessible translations and large print versions of the book Alcoholics Anonymous, as well as workbooks to help study the program of Alcoholics Anonymous can be addressed with a common solution.

The subcommittee has been tasked with identifying and gathering information about the issues driving both previous and current requests regarding the language and tools to access the book Alcoholics Anonymous. The objective is to collect relevant information concerning all aspects related to these issues to facilitate a broader, more fully informed discussion at both the board and conference levels.

Two main themes have been identified from our discussions:

  • Accessibility – due to the literacy level or lack of ability to adequately comprehend the message of recovery by the individual as written in the book Alcoholics Anonymous.

  • Relatability – changes in current language and culture (including views on modern language, gender and religion) which hinder the individual’s ability to relate and embrace the program as set forth in the book Alcoholics Anonymous.

Do you agree continuing to finding a “common solution” to the requested “translations/workbooks?” Why or Why not?

Consider requests to revise the book Alcoholics Anonymous: (Note 4th Edition)

1. Add pages 3 through 41 of the pamphlet “The A.A. Group” as an appendix in the next printing.

As many groups read from the text, “Alcoholics Anonymous,” it would be helpful to include “The A.A. Group” pamphlet its appendix. It is believed that having the pamphlet inserted would encourage best practices and participation in general service. Ultimately, this could help improve our service culture to the benefit of the groups, the still suffering alcoholic, and Alcoholics Anonymous as a whole.

Do you agree to include the AA Group pamphlet as an appendix to the Big Book? Why or Why Not?

2. Revise the first 164 pages

We recommend that the Conference form a study committee to audit the first 164 pages of the Big Book with the purpose of identifying changes that can be made to make the Big Book more reflective of the A.A. membership composition. The focus should be on identifying the following for possible change:

  • Pronoun usage – where possible the gender-neutral form should be incorporated.

  • Passages or sections that are no longer consistent with or relevant when taken in context of society in general or the A.A. membership composition.

  • The chapters To Wives and The Family Afterward should specifically be evaluated for revisions to be more consistent with today’s membership.

Do you agree to revising the first 164 pages of the Big Book? Why or Why Not?

Consider proposals related to possible Fifth Edition of the book Alcoholics Anonymous:

1. Develop a Fifth Edition

The committee reviewed requests for proposed Conference agenda items related to the possible development of a Fifth Edition of the book, Alcoholics Anonymous. The committee recognized the priority of addressing whether or not a Fifth Edition of the book, Alcoholics Anonymous, might be developed before addressing items related to content and format changes.

Do you believe we should begin development of a 5th Edition of the Big Book? Why or why not?

2. Develop a Fifth Edition of the book Alcoholics Anonymous with updated stories and revisions to Appendices III and V.

Sampling of suggested changes:

  • Stories should emphasize current sobriety.

  • The request to update the appendices isn't intended to remove any of the current language, but rather to expand on existing ideas in Appendices Ill and V.

  • Update Appendix Ill (The Medical View on A.A.) to include more information on mental illness. The language could be similar to (or directly lifted from) ''The A.A. Member Medications and Other Drugs." Specifically, page 6 of the pamphlet, where it talks about some alcoholics needing medication.

  • Appendix Ill references a pamphlet that is now out of print. It says, ‘This address is now available in pamphlet form...under the title 'Three Talks to Medical Societies by Bill W’.”

  • Update Appendix V and include perspectives from different faiths. Currently, the only perspectives offered are from Father Ed Dowling, who was Catholic, and an Episcopalian magazine. There are many other faiths that can be included - Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, Islam, etc.

  • The fellowship is overdue for a new edition of the book. Historically, there is an approximately 20-year average between the different editions of the Big Book (1st edition, 1939; 2nd edition, 1955; 3rd edition, 1976; 4th edition, 2001).

Do you agree with revising the appendices as requested? Why or Why Not?

3. Add a proposed addendum to a fifth Edition foreword of the book Alcoholics Anonymous at the time it is published.

Consider a proposed addendum to a Fifth Edition forward, of the book Alcoholics
Anonymous, at the time it is published. The addendum of gender terms is written with the intent that all who are seeking answers (help) for a drinking problem are encouraged to give Alcoholics Anonymous a try.
…We find there are many who find the gender terms of the Big Book somewhat insensitive in this era. AA addresses many "issues" people find problematic in the program but the bias of the gender terms in the Big Book are not undertaken anywhere that we can find…Our proposal mentions adding as an addendum and since this is what we voted on, I am not changing the wording but it is meant as an addition to the forward.

Do you agree with adding an addendum to the 5th edition? Why or Why Not?

Cooperation with the Professional Community

Discuss progress report on LinkedIn page implementation.

The majority opinion of the subcommittee is that Alcoholics Anonymous should have a Company Page on LinkedIn to enhance our cooperation with the professional community.
It would offer another digital resource in addition to our website where professionals could find accurate information about A.A. and where we could address misconceptions; it would broaden the reach of About A.A.; it could offer a venue for our professional friends to recommend us which is significant given the impact of peer to peer communication; it could expand the network of professional friends which could deepen the pool of Class A candidates; it could raise awareness of national and local professional conferences where A.A. would be exhibiting; and our presence on LinkedIn could reinforce the continuing relevance and efficacy of our Program.

Do you agree with the continuing LinkedIn Page for C.P.C. committees? Why or Why not?


Review the pamphlet “Self-Support: Where Money and Spirituality Mix.”

1. Consider a request to revise the pie chart percentages on page 12.

In the pamphlet ”Self-Support: Where Money and Spirituality Mix” on page 12, I would like to see the percentages on the pie chart changed back to the following:

(top chart)
30% to district
20% to area committee
10% to G.S.O.
40% to intergroup or central office

(bottom chart)
60% to district
30% to area
10% to G.S.O

Here is my reasoning. I do not think that group contributions to G.S.O. should have the same percentage (and certainly not a higher percentage) than district and Area because a district in our area has only a total of between 5 to 40 groups in which to receive group contributions coming in. (We all know that not 100% of groups are able to send any contributions at all.) Our area only has 200 some odd groups to receive contributions from. On the other hand G.S.O. has all the groups in Canada and the USA to receive contributions from. It seems logical that the less amount of groups you have to receive contributions from, the higher the percentage you need to get in order to carry the message locally.

Do you agree with the request to revise the piece chart percentages? Why or Why Not?

2. Consider request regarding contribution percentages to service entities.

Specifically, the center and bottom pie charts illustrated on page 13 of the pamphlet depict the seemingly sanctioned division of contribution funds between service entities. As the delivery of services varies, sometimes greatly, from Area to Area, and between districts, and among central offices/intergroups, we believe that GSO should not make any suggestions about contributions to these entities. Instead, we propose that the one pie chart without filled-in percentages (top illustration) be retained and the following text be added to p. 7 and p. 13: “Duties of the entities notated above are described on page 7 of this pamphlet. Performance of these service duties vary from area to area. Please be sure to inquire which services these entities provide in YOUR area and contribute accordingly.”
Our Area feels that the middle pie chart illustrated on page 13 of said pamphlet construes a seemingly sanctioned division of funds between 4 entities (10% to district; 10% to area committee; 30% to GSO and 50% to intergroup or central office).

Do you agree with revising the pie chart showing percentages NOT filled in and text added to p. 7 and 13? Why or Why not?

3. Consider draft language related to the “virtual basket.”

A number of groups have utilized digital payment platforms as an adjunct to passing the basket in the conventional sense in order to provide opportunities for cashless contributions. There are different payment platforms to facilitate this service and it is up to the group to determine which one to use. Some groups have found that a smartphone app-based payment platform is the most efficient, seamless and minimally disruptive solution for providing a digital contribution. Experience suggests that the treasurer is a likely choice to handle digital contributions, though some groups add more than one trusted servant to share the responsibilities or create a new service position to inform the group about digital payment options and assist other group members who are interested in contributing this way.

Do you agree with the request add draft language regarding virtual basket?? Why or Why Not?


D. …to use gender neutral pronouns. For example, “Alcoholics Anonymous is a fellowship of people who share their experience, strength and hope with each other…”

In 2018 and 2019, AA Grapevine received six requests to revise the A.A. Preamble.
D. Revise the Preamble to use gender neutral pronouns. For example, "Alcoholics Anonymous is a fellowship of people who share their experience, strength and hope with each other..." “…our group frequently receives attendees that identify as part of the LQBTQ+ community. Some of these are newcomers who haven't experienced Alcoholics Anonymous before. There are also members of our group that identify as such. We value the Preamble…However, we feel that this wording is not all-inclusive.”

Do you agree to revise the preamble to reflect gender neutral text? Why or Why not?

Consider request to develop an A.A. Grapevine pamphlet on how the AA Grapevine can be utilized to carry the A.A. message.

The new pamphlet might be titled something like: "How to use the A.A. Grapevine to Carry the A.A. Message." And should include the A.A. Grapevine Statement of purpose. And could also include separate sections discussing how to use the A.A. Grapevine in specific areas of A.A. life, such as:

  • Meeting topics

  • Correctional Facilities

  • Probation and Parole

  • Treatment facilities, etc.

Do you think an AA Grapevine pamphlet is needed? Why or Why Not?

Consider a request to change the name of the GSC Committee on Grapevine to the Conference Committee on Grapevine and La Viña

There has been much positive growth in uniformity by the GSC with regard to the relationship between The Grapevine magazine for the English speaking community and La Viña for the Spanish speaking community. By expanding upon the name of this committee it will enhance the relationship between our "international journals" and provide a positive display of unity.

Do you agree with this name change? Why or Why Not?


Consider a proposed process for equitable distribution of Conference committees’ workload.

The trustees’ Committee on the General Service Conference develop a plan for
the equitable distribution of the workload of Conference committees by combining
and/or creating committees for review by the 2018 Conference Committee on

Do you agree a proposed process for equitable distribution of Conference committees’ workload should be considered? Why or Why Not?

Public Information

Discuss a request “to create a new form of communication” to address anonymity on social media.

…to create a new form of communication specifically addressing the use of social media and anonymity. Highlighting anonymity can be a life or death issue. Specific education for current and future members about anonymity using social media is our responsibility.

Do you agree that a new form of communications needs development? Why or Why Not?

Report & Charter

Consider restoring the two paragraphs and the accompanying footnote in the Concept Eleven essay of The Twelve Concepts for World Service that were removed by an advisory action of the 66th GSC.

In order to maintain the Historical Integrity of our Fellowship, we are requesting that the GSC return to the practice of not changing Bill W.’s writings and to also return to the policy of printing the Twelve Concepts for World Service as originally written by Bill W. in 1962, as stated in the Preface to the Twelve Concepts.
The 66th GSC Advisory Action of the Report and Charter Committee removed two paragraphs from the 11th Concept Essay, which is the writing of our co-founder, Bill Wilson. The Agenda item read: Agenda Item A: the AA Service Manual, 2016-2017 Edition 6. Consider request to revise text in the Concept Eleven Essay regarding “male/female” distinctions in the Twelve Concepts for World Service.

Paragraphs involved:
Women workers present still another problem. Our Headquarters is pretty much a man’s world. Some men are apt to feel, unconsciously, that they are women’s superiors, thus producing a reflex reaction in the gals. Then, too, some of us – of both sexes – have been emotionally damaged in the area of man-woman relations. Our drinking has made us wrongly dependent on our marriage partners. We have turned them into our moms” and “pops” and then we have deeply resented that situation. Perhaps maladjustment has taken still other turns which leave us with a hangover of hostility that we are apt to project into any man woman relatedness that we undertake.
It is possible for these forces to defeat the good working partnerships we would like to have. But if we are fully aware of these tendencies they can be the more easily overcome, and forgiven. We can be aware also that any sound working relation between adult men and women must be in the character of a partnership, a non-competitive one in which each partner complements the other. It is not a question of superiority or inferiority at all. Men, for example, because they are men, are apt to be better at business. But suppose we replaced our six women staff members with six men? In these positions could the men possibly relate themselves so uniquely and so effectively to our Fellowship as the women? Of course not. The women can handle this assignment far better, just because they are women.”

Do you agree with these two paragraphs being reinserted in the service manual? Why or Why Not?


Consider request to develop a Bridging the Gap Workbook

There are currently pamphlets available from GS0 regarding Bridging the Gap, but
there is not a BTG Workbook. The Bridging the Gap Workbook would combine the Most important aspects drawn from both the GS0 Corrections and Treatment Workbooks to achieve a complete understanding of the overall Bridging the Gap process.

Do you agree a Bridging the Gap workbook is needed? Why or Why Not?


Consider requests to develop a book on A.A. history from 1955 through the present.

The (trustees) committee considered a request to “Develop a definitive book on A.A. history from 1955 – 1985, working title, Alcoholics Anonymous Continues to Age or A.A., The Next 30 Years.” The committee also considered a second request to “Develop a book titled, A.A. Comes of Age ll.” The committee noted the similarities between the two requests and agreed to forward to the 2020 Conference Committee on Archives the requests to consider the development of a book on A.A. history from 1955 through the present.

Do you agree with the request to publish a new book on AA history? Why or Why not?

Int’l Conventions/Regional Forums

Discuss methods of closing the Big Meetings at the International Convention.

"For the last 4 Internationals…the closings for the Big Meetings have been Friday night: Lord's Prayer, Saturday night: Serenity Prayer and Sunday morning: Responsibility Statement. …GSO has historically received communications in favor or against one or any of the closings. For the most part the communications have been evenly distributed. The current closing distribution hopes to include all views."

Do you have an opinion on how the big meetings should be closed? Why or Why Not?

Thank you!

Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts on these items that are so very important to AA.

Didn’t see an item in the short survey that you are interested in?
There are many more items on the agenda, if you want to provide input on any of the other the remaining agenda items please complete the

Full Agenda Item Survey

If you complete all questions it will take about 30 minutes. You can answer only the ones you wish to answer to shorten the length of time spent.

In Love and Service,

Bill L.

Panel 70 Delegate
Area 46, New Mexico

Name (Optional)
Email Address (Optional)